livingproof #3: genesis.
I often
wonder who invented the term “Reality TV.” It wasn’t
someone interested in building a community, this I can tell you. Perhaps
the television producers preach the virtues of pulling strangers together,
strangers that eventually become friends—perhaps they preach
the virtues of the bonding experience the cast members go through,
but that’s not entirely true... Read
more.
Part of an interview with Daniel Sinker, Chicago-based publisher
of Punk Planet and Bail
magazines.
Do you make your living off of working for Punk Planet,
or do you have another job?
I do now. It’s been just about three years that my whole
money has come from the magazine. When I started I was still in
school, working three jobs, and doing the magazine. When I graduated
from school, I got a job at the Chicago Reader in the production
department, which was basically 40 or 50 hours a week in three days—which
were crazy days, but plenty of time free to do the magazine. That
then kind of moved to only working at the Reader one day a week
and doing freelance graphic design work along with the magazine.
I finally dropped the Reader to just do freelance graphic design
and the magazine, and then finally about three years ago killed
the freelance jobs... Read more.
There were nineteen of us, nine guys and ten girls. Half of us
architecture majors, half of us composition majors. We all met up
at the airport in Newark for the plane trip late on a Friday afternoon,
with a strange type of apprehensive excitement permeating the group—we
weren’t exactly sure what we were in for, but it was going
to be new to us, whatever it was. Our semester abroad outside Venice
was going to last for four months. I wasn’t the only one who
left a girlfriend standing at the security checkpoint... Read
more.
stats
first printing: 300 (red numbers)
size: 5.5x8.5 (half-letter)
pages: 64
cover: matte mustard cardstock, single-color print (green)
reviews
Broken Pencil #27: Living
Proof is an ambitious project, and I’m sorry I haven’t come across the
previous editions. This third installment only contains three items: a
very smart four-part rumination on the advent of reality television and
MTV’s role in that; a really long but essentially satisfying interview
with Dan Sinker of the seminal publication Punk Planet; and a series of
chapters from Mall’s own ongoing novella. It’s a bit hard to conceive of
a zine so well put together having only three parts, but this cool and
compelling compilation is strong. I don’t want to give anything away, but
this outstanding zine will knock you over.
Loop Distro: This is the Genesis
issue, and is filled with Andrew’s contemplations of life and meaning. He
starts out by discussing the state of our media, television specifically,
and questions what the hell we’re doing with 80 different channels of shitty
programming. But he quickly shifts away from TV, and brings focus to the concept
of printed material. A good long interview with Punk Planet’s Dan Sinker follows.
And I do mean good and long, two words which rarely go together when describing
and interview, but trust me on this one. After that, it’s back to the story-telling,
mostly about school and friends, with nice photos showing up every few pages.
NewPages Zine Rack #24:
For those who favor a zine that utilizes every inch of its printed space for
the presentation of text that critically and analytically explores the self
and the self’s surroundings, Livingproof is your goldmine. Andrew Mall writes
a lot in the third issue of his zine, and certainly covers a significant amount
of ground. Though the divisions are subtle, the zine is divided into three sections.
The first section is a multi-layered essay arguing against MTV for declining from
a relevant and caring music network to creating reality television and, of course,
for basically selling out. Second, Andrew transcribes a very long discussion he had
with Daniel Sinker, editor of Punk Planet, which branches away from solely Punk
Planet-related talk to bigger issues in independent press and music and the
importance of retaining independence. In the third section, Andrew talks about a few
months he spent in Venice, which he refers to as “the next chapter in the personal
novella.” Indeed, it certainly is rare for a zine writer to offer up, in such full
doses and in a single publication, such personal writing, such critical essaying,
and even a complete dialogue that seems to embody both subjects and more.
Punk Planet #66: I have to commend Andrew
Mall because each issue of this zine appears in my mailbox despite my twice-written
mediocre responses to him. He’s dedicated, he’s got a vision, and he sticks to it
\ in the face of criticism, and there is something to be said about that. Unfortunately
though, this is my least favorite issue of the zine thus far. The only thing that
really stuck out to me was the interview with Dan Sinker about the nuts and bolts of
running Punk Planet. Much of the rest of the writing is a bit too wordy and meandering
for me, whether he’s talking about his lack of athletic prowess, reality TV or going
to Italy. If some literary deconstructing of everyday things sounds good to you, pick
this up.
Slug
& Lettuce #82: This zine will appeal to many people. First, it’s
really appealing to look at; cleanly laid out with half-toned photographs
and text lines jumping out at the reader in bold print. There is a 23-page
interview with Dan Sinker of Punk Planet that is in-depth, informative,
inspirational, and entertaining. They mostly talk about the state of
alternative media in the U.S., but they use that as impetus to talk about
many other things as well. There is also a 38-page recounting of a semester
spent in Europe, the people he met, and the amazing things he saw and did.
It’s not just a “then we did this, then we did that” tour diary, either,
Andrew uses his insight and experience to write a really engaging story. If
you enjoy reading about alternative media or really cool trip journals, or
just like looking at a really handsome zine, this is worth the measly $3.00.
Xerography Debt #16: A
well-written perzine with lots of ideas. Andrew opens this issue with an
extended essay on the notion of reality TV and MTV and his thoughts on how to
counteract their influence in your own life. He also has an extended interview
with Dan Sinker, publisher of the zine Punk Planet. They talk a lot about
independent publishing and music, and how he has managed to stay independent
and gain a measure of success in the business, and how DIY culture has changed
with the rise of the internet. A good, intelligent interview. The last part of
this zine is the third chapter of Andrew’s “personal novella.” I haven’t read the
first two parts, but that didn’t keep me from enjoying this. It stands just fine
on its own as a travelogue of a college semester in Italy.
Zine Thug #6: Ooh, did this rub me the
wrong way. How should I list the reasons? For your sake and, more importantly,
for the sake of the creator, let’s approach this systematically. I give you the
five intolerable offenses of this Living Proof: (1) The correspondence that came
enclosed with the zine. I get these all the time. “Dear Mr. Parker, please review
my such and such. The price is this, my web site is blank, I do/don’t accept
trades.” They are for the most part unnecessary — as long as the same info appears
somewhere in the zine — but rarely bothersome. The mail-merge form letter that
Andrew sent, however . . . He goes on for a full page about his publishing history,
distribution, and even includes advance praise for the issue at hand. I don’t give
a damn if A.j. Michel said yours is the best personal zine she’s ever seen, or if
she went through it with a highlighter pen. You gotta let the product speak for
itself, kiddo. (2) The article on reality TV. It’s so summer of 2000. I don’t gain
anything from your thoughts on “community”, my friend. You are no social scientist
— especially when there’s cable in that hovel you share with three other dudes. (3)
The way-too-long interview with Daniel Sinker, publisher of Punk Planet. Don’t get
me wrong; I enjoy the heck out of his magazine. And I found it fascinating, the
convoluted criteria the man subjects to anything featured therein, to determine if
a band or a record label is still independent enough. The inner workings of the mag
were similarly fun to read about. But the widely-spaced items of interest are
undermined (or simply lost) as the conversation drags on. Andrew even addresses the
extended nature of the piece in his introduction, writing: “this is really quite big,
so if you hate reading interviews you should probably put this issue down right now.”
How considerate of the reader! Now, listen. I know you had the time of your life
visiting the Punk Planet offices, chatting with such a cool older guy, then transcribing
the entire ninety-minute cassette in the weeks to come. I know it made your day, that he
swept the floor just ‘cause you were coming over, and you think we’d like to read about
that, too. I’m sorry, but we don’t. It’s overly amateurish. Maybe if your zine were
photocopied, I would understand not cutting a single word from the discussion, but it’s
obvious you put a lot of money into this. Everyone will be a lot better off if, next
time, you consider my advice. Clean that shit up, man. (4) The rest of the issue, i.e.,
“Part Three of a personal novella”. I actually just skimmed this. But I read the second
chapter, in #2, and found it so wistfully naive that my stomach literally turned. “All
I want is a girl to admire the punk rawk patches on my couch”, or something. In this
issue, he travels to Europe. I’m nauseous all over again. (5) This one’s a tie. I detest
the desktop-published layout — how Andrew punches what he considers to be key lines by
increasing the type size and making the words bold. (It’s really annoying in the Sinker
interview.) But just as much, I cannot stand the last paragraph of his introduction: “All
of my pieces are dated [printed big and bold]. This one’s from Summer 2004. Thanks to
everyone who has enjoyed the journey thus far, and thanks to you for reading. Cheers.”
Fuck everyone who says “cheers” like that.
|